About Millennial Review

Millennial Review started as a simple Tumblr page in 2015 with a small goal, support Bernie Sanders. He was a relatively unknown curmudgeonly socialist from Vermont. Exactly what we were looking for.

Well, maybe not exactly, but the closest thing we’d seen in American politics in our lifetime. In the months that followed we connected tens of thousands of committed activists, thinkers, and posters. Millions of impressions later, we’re still championing the vision of justice which attracted us to Bernie Sanders to begin with.

Outside of producing leftist content co-founder Trevor Memmott is a PhD candidate at Indiana University School of Environmental and Public Affairs. And co-founder Justin Ackerman is a law student at UCLA School of Law. Both are committed socialists, avid readers, prolific podcast listeners and hope you take the time to read a bit, listen a bit, support the cause and most importantly spread the message!

Andrew Yang: A Neoliberal Tech-Bro in Sheep’s Clothing

Shares
Read Carefully

Andrew Yang has made a name for himself campaigning on what he claims is a slick innovative solution to the coming existential crisis that is automation. Yang himself would take it a step further, this isn’t just a solution to a coming crisis. The crisis is here and it’s getting worse, so we better act fast.  

Whether it’s his book or an interview with anyone who will listen, Yang will tell you of the 3 million plus truck drivers who will lose their job in the next ten years by his estimation. The deaths of despair this has inspired are central in Yang’s messaging. Record high overdose deaths, record high suicide rates, and Yang traces this back to the deindustrialization of the Midwest and the job loss therein. So in Yang’s mind, this is only going to get worse, millions more people will soon be pushed to that same position. And in response, Yang offers universal basic income as the savior for millions who have lost their job and the millions more who will in the years to come.

However, what Yang bills as a revolutionary solution to the coming apocalypse, is simply a drop in the bucket that doesn’t grapple with any of the real structural issues which cause these problems to begin with. It’s important to remember that Bill Clinton was once billed as an innovative change maker and now represents the rot of neoliberalism. Yang is a Clintonian in wait, he’s a silicon valley tech bro who came to fight a fire with a squirt gun, but it’s a really, really flashy squirt gun. Unfortunately it’s also a really big fire.

When Yang went on the Joe Rogan Experience, who Yang called “the primary voice of reason in our society right now” (which by itself should be disqualifying), Rogan highlighted the big problem with this proposal. It’s simply not enough, $1,000 dollars a month hardly covers half of people’s rent in most major cities. It doesn’t cover record high medical costs. It hardly pays for most people’s student loan bills. It’s not enough to meaningfully invest in education or start a small business. Perhaps most importantly, it won’t meaningfully stop the core problem inherent in the coming automation Andrew Yang pins these various crisis on.

Joe Rogan said it best (first and last time I’ll ever say that) when he asked, “when a trucker who’s job is automated loses their $50,000 dollar a year job, and all they have is $12,000 dollars and no sense of purpose, what are they supposed to do?” Yang didn’t have a very compelling response, he replied to the effect of, we’ve got to lay down a safety net to keep these people from slipping through the cracks. By slipping through the cracks he means falling victim to the same future of those who’s jobs were lost before them.

Yet $1,000 dollars a month won’t allow them to maintain the standard of living they currently enjoy and it won’t go nearly far enough toward solving any of those larger structural problems. When the average American spends anywhere from 15% to 25% of their income on childcare, over 50% of their income on rent, thousands a month for healthcare, and hundreds on student loans, what good is $1,000 dollars a month? It’s not nothing. It might cover one of those expenses, it might knock a monthly item off the budget, but it won’t provide the safety net Yang believes it will.

It won’t stop predatory landlords from taking advantage of the $1,000 a month their tenants now receive. It won’t stop predatory student loan companies and for profit colleges from targeting low income students and trapping them under tens of thousands of dollars in debt for close to useless degrees. It won’t stop pharmaceutical companies and the insurance industry from holding millions of Americans hostage and overcharging them for necessary care. It won’t lower the $1.5 trillion dollar student loan burden and it won’t make college more affordable (especially if the average pell grant recipient loses their entire UBI payment because of their college benefits, as Yang proposes).

Yang’s not wrong when he paints a bleak future. He’s not wrong that there are fundamental structural crises ravaging the economy and wreaking havoc in the lives of millions of people. In fact, his diagnosis of the problem is actually fairly compelling. Which is part of the problem, because his solution is almost as bad as the half steps of yesteryear. Perhaps even worse, because it does nothing to solve these structural problems. It does nothing to shore up the lives of millions of people in any meaningful way and it won’t restructure the economy to quit exploiting them. It just gives the entities that already extract income from low income Americans all over the country an extra $1,000 dollars.

Mainstreaming the automation crisis as a coming issue and the universal basic income as a policy position is useful, but he bills it as the solution to coming calamity, and it’s nothing even close to that.

Combine that with statements like, “you gotta enforce a strong border, especially in a world where every citizen is getting $1,000 dollars a month. You gotta enforce a strong border.” Or a general tech bro demeanor, focus on entrepreneurs, and infatuation with the culture of big tech, and you have Andrew Yang as a whole. He’s nothing new. He’s not flashy. He’s offering Americans the same “innovation” that Silicon Valley offered while turning half the country into wage slave “independent contractors.”

Except this time it’s $1,000 dollars a month. Take it and smile, and then when the robots come for your job, you better not complain. Yang and the rest of the entrepreneur class gave you some crumbs, be grateful.

Comments (2)

  • Mr. Roboto

    March 28, 2019 - 9:32 am

    Great podcast episode, have some thoughts on Yang and how his candidacy relates to the primary race. Does Millennial Review accept emails?

    Reply
  • Matt

    April 3, 2019 - 9:10 pm

    This is pretty misleading. You’ve set up a strawman argument that UBI is Yang’s end-all-be-all policy. It’s not. He has a bunch of other policy proposals which include medicare for all and resolving the student debt crisis.

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Millennial Review for Fresh Memes Delivered Daily:

Follow Millennial Review on Twitter


Just in case you forgot, there is $1.5 trillion dollars in outstanding student loan debt in the United States today. That's why young people can't afford to have kids, buy a home, or eat out.

Hey, no more commodified housing. No more profit from people's pain in the form of private insurance and healthcare. Nationalize the fossil fuel industry so we don't have profiteers cashing in on climate catastrophe.

Big changes are what will fix these criss. Nothing less.

It's easy to underestimate how big of an election 2020 really is. Trump is awful, but he didn't come out of nowhere. Trumpism is the result of decades of bipartisan policy failure. We need to fix that with a dramatic shift from the status quo, not more of what got us here.

Listen to the Millennial Review Politics Podcast:

Top